Good work shouldn't metabolise people.
Home Truths is a confidential questionnaire about what actually happens at work. It looks for patterns across what your people have seen and gives you somewhere specific to start looking.
You get a report that shows what's worth investigating, how it might be happening, and what's still unclear.
{ if (window.innerWidth >= bp.minWidth) enabled = bp.enabled; });
if (!enabled) return;
$event.preventDefault();
const pic = $el.closest('picture');
const light = pic && pic.querySelector('source[data-lightbox-role="light"]');
const dark = pic && pic.querySelector('source[data-lightbox-role="dark"]');
$dispatch('image-lightbox-open', {
id: 'rw73865B27_C2DD_40BF_9BCE_942C8D81179E',
src: (light && light.getAttribute('srcset')) || $el.currentSrc || $el.src,
srcDark: (dark && dark.getAttribute('srcset')) || null,
alt: $el.alt,
});
" oncontextmenu="return false" ondragstart="return false" onmousedown="return false" loading="lazy" decoding="async" />
A Home Truths report opens up with a Stat Block - a high-level summary of what it found. Click the pic to see the full thing.
A Condition is a pattern of trouble that keeps itself going, and they're what Home Truths sets out to find evidence for. Take Firefighting Mode. Everyone's so busy sorting out today's emergency that nobody has time to fix what keeps causing them. So tomorrow brings another emergency.
The more people who take part, the more Conditions Home Truths can usually look for. Who takes part matters too. The people running the work and the people doing the work can see quite different things.
Snapshot gives a small group a way to find leads worth following up. Foundation takes a deeper look at the same seven Conditions and can identify things with more confidence – where enough people have had a good look and consistently describe things working well (or not so well), the report can say so. After Foundation, each edition adds more Conditions.
Snapshot
5+ people · 7 Conditions
A first look at common Conditions such as Firefighting Mode, Meeting Inflation and Documentation Debt.
Foundation
20+ people · 7 Conditions
A deeper look at those same seven, with more people to draw on and more scope to say what's working well.
Practice & Authority
26+ people · 9 Conditions
Adds Process Worship and Politics. Think rules people follow long after they've stopped helping, or decisions that hinge on who you know.
Boundary
42+ people · 13 Conditions
Adds patterns like Hidden Burnout and Silo Formation, which can be hard to see from any one part of the organisation.
Full Core
56+ people · 16 Conditions
Adds Learned Helplessness, Hero Dependency and Competence Concentration.
Home Truths is a useful first step. It gives you something to work with and helps you decide whether a fuller investigation is worth doing. If it is, I can spend time with your people, follow the work as it happens and use the full House Rules framework to find out what's driving the trouble.
01
Set up the read
I help you work out which part of the organisation you want to look at and who's in a position to tell you about it.
02
People answer in confidence
They fill in a multiple-choice questionnaire online. The questions ask about things they've seen happen in their work.
03
See what's worth following up
You get a report that shows which patterns people described, how they might be coming about and what's still unclear.
What you get.
The Stat Block gives you the short version. The full Home Truths report explains what points to each pattern, what complicates the picture, and where people had too little of a view to say.
Privacy
People need to be able to tell you things you mightn't want to hear.
You won't see anyone's individual answers or who took part (or didn't). The report leaves out detail that could give someone away. It only names teams when the reporting rules allow it.
You'll find answers to common questions over to the right. Anything I've not covered, hit the button below.
I'm looking for organisations willing to try Home Truths while I'm testing it. I'll run these first reads for free. In return, I'd like to hear what the report helped you see, what rang true, and where it missed the mark.